Donate $25 for two DVDs of the Cryptome collection of files from June 1996 to the present

Natsios Young Architects

27 July 2010

This is from several open Wikileaks mail lists for the media, volunteers, contributors and recruits.

Wikileaks: Fear in the Western Fourth Estate

November 24, 2008

Wikileaks often receives messages from Western journalists expressing
substantial levels of fear.

For instance, many Western news organizations, even when reporting
a document, self-censor links to it (but not other links).
Self-censoring organizations include Time/CNN, the News Statesman,
and the Guardian. The "4.0" estate is no better, the Wikimedia
Foundation, Digg and others have all pulled links after, or
before, legal threats.

Journalists working in the most of the developing world, who are
occasionally arrested for hard-hitting stories, find this pusillanimous
behavior incomprehensible.

States with highly disconnected power hierarchies, such as Russia
during the mid 1990s give us a clue to as to the difference in
perceptions between developing and Western journalists.

In transitional states, journalistic freedom and journalistic
persecution appear to stem from the same root cause; the inability
of power groups to defend themselves from journalists by using means
more sophisticated than arrest or murder.  Because the latter comes
at some cost to the persecutor they are rarely employed. In other
words all but a few "off limit" subjects can be reported freely and
these limits are not yet well understood, which is why some journalists
are murdered.

In the West, more sophisticated means are systemic and include
economic and patronage incentives and a defensive restructuring of
power group activities into complex financial webs which are resistant
to press exposure.

While it is easy to count journalistic arrests and murders, great
skepticism should be exercised in representing the lack of such
assaults as marker of a free or effective press. Precisely the
opposite conclusion may be true.

An example letter from a Western journalist:

> Hi,

> While I do not see everything which you send me of value, I do see much
of what I've been sent as extremely significant material.  I regret to add that
I have not opened much of what you have sent me, concern over potential
'legal ramifications' being the reason.  In short, I - like too many other journalists -
have too often been effectively intimidated into silence.

> In the past I've endured death threats, being shot at, having the steering
unscrewed on my car, etc...and yet, I find myself compelled to avoid documentation
with a 'controversial' legal standing, regardless of the legitimacy of those documents. 
While I still break quite significant news, I artificially limit myself to those sources
which cannot engender 'legal issues'. 

> Am I a coward?  I think not, but I am well aware of the tools employed to silence
those with the courage to speak, and I cautiously avoid presenting 'the bad guys' with
a 'weak point' in the defenses I've built.  I am not certain how Wikileaks has avoided
the devastation such 'weak points' have brought, but I am glad you have. 

> Does the world need the ugly truths that lurk behind the sparklingly clean and gleaming
white facades that so often surround them - yes!  Without broad public awareness of the
harsh realities we face, how can we, as a society, hope to address these issues?  Of course,
those whom the ongoing ignorance benefits wish to maintain it, and so the need for
organizations such as yours.

> What can be done to improve Wikileaks?  I imagine that you're working on a great many
things; but, perhaps paramount among these is the ongoing establishment of the 'legitimacy'
of Wikileaks as a source, a source which can one day be utilized without raising legitimate
concern over 'the consequences'.

> When I was a boy growing up in The States, there was a TV game show called 'Truth or
Consequences'.  Too often today I have seen a reality called 'truth and consequences'. 
The first was funny, but the second...

| Why you receive this mail and what to do with it:
| You are receiving this mail because you were invited to
| the Wikileaks Press Release list run by the transparency group Sunshine Press.
| Releases ensure you are aware, before the rest of the world,
| of significant geopolitical and other disclosures released
| by Wikileaks, an international platform for the first release of
| of classified, confidential or censored materials of political,
| diplomatic, ethical or historical interest.
| We rely on you to distribute the content of this mail to your
| community, industry, press and regulators, to defend us in your
| country and to invite people of integrity and commitment via
| via
| Our materials range from secret Guantanamo documents to political
| assassinations to confidential reports of children's hospital
| corruption, and have spawned tens of thousands of press articles,
| many reforms and changed electoral outcomes.
| Releases average one per week but can be higher or lower depending on
| events. You can easily set the frequency to monthly or change your
| subscription via
| If you know people that have access to sensitive documents of public
| interest, tell them about us. We have an unbroken record of protecting
| sensitive sources and defeating censorship attacks from all corners of the globe.
| See
| If you are about to release an investigative report or article, we can release the
| underlaying source material concurrently to substantiate the allegations,
| draw attention away from the true source, deflect legal or censorship
| attacks and promote secondary investigations and public awareness.
| Live bank-grade encrypted chat to the office is available via
| (multiple languages spoken)
| Inquiries for speaking engagements, comment, interventions, | investigations,
|source-protection and censorship consultations
| may be addressed to
| If you are serious about analysis, translation,
| legal, coding, network, financial or other contributions, please contact
| us via:
| See for all other information and
| for secure access.