10 June 2013
Snowden Censored by Craven Media
Mr. Snowden, please send your 41 PRISM slides and other information to less
easily cowed and overly coddled commercial outlets than Washington Post and
Guardian. Their arm-waving, self-aggrandizing verbosity, after conspiring
to obey official demand (below) to censor your
information is a pattern well-documented by unfettered disclosure sites.
Their piecemealing release is hoary dramatization, diverting cover-up, of
failure to deliver untampered material. Your valor is yet to be fully disclosed,
do not settle for being seduced by false promises portending being kicked
under the bus. Heed this under-bus-kick
by Secrecy News:
EDWARD SNOWDEN, SOURCE OF NSA LEAKS, STEPS FORWARD
... "When you are subverting the power of government-- that's a fundamentally
dangerous thing to democracy."
"I'm willing to go on the record to defend the authenticity [of these
disclosures]. This is the truth. This is what's happening. You should decide
whether we need to be doing this," he said of his disclosures.
In the history of unauthorized disclosures of classified information, a voluntary
admission of having committed such disclosures is the exception, not the
norm. And it confers a degree of dignity on the action. Yet it stops short
of a full acceptance of responsibility. That would entail surrendering to
authorities and accepting the legal consequences of "subverting the power
of government" and carrying out "a fundamentally dangerous thing to
And two days ago this
kick by The Atlantic:
Whistle-blowing is the moral response to immoral activity by those in power.
What's important here are government programs and methods, not data about
individuals. I understand I am asking for people to engage in illegal
and dangerous behavior. Do it carefully and do it safely, but -- and I am
talking directly to you, person working on one of these secret and probably
illegal programs -- do it.
High officers and rhetoricians convene safe at base to wargame, destined
by history, to praise and send youngsters into harm's way to protect high
privilege, then crow about leadership, sacrifice, pretending remorse, gloating
in amply-pensioned retirement. Bear in mind, fodder for their ambitions is
how they see you imprisoned for disobedience, emblazoned in by-lined headlines,
warehoused in vet hospitals, or best, flag-draped in coffins disappearing
into vote-rigged databanks.
To effect his plan, Snowden asked for a guarantee that The Washington Post
would publish - within 72 hours - the full text of a PowerPoint presentation
describing PRISM, a top-secret surveillance program that gathered intelligence
from Microsoft, Facebook, Google and other Silicon Valley companies. He also
asked that The Post publish online a cryptographic key that he could use
to prove to a foreign embassy that he was the document's source.
Gellman told him the Post would not make any guarantee about what the Post
published or when. The Post broke the story two weeks later, on Thursday.
The Post sought the views of government officials about the potential harm
to national security prior to publication and decided to reproduce only four
of the 41 slides, Gellman wrote in his story about their communications.