25 November 2005. A writes:
Some commentary if you're interested.The man [writing below] isn't factually wrong if you look past all his rhetoric and jargon.
I myself was in a whorehouse in Amman the night the bombing (I am one of the US mercs (or in PC terms, dirty nasty contractors)). I had stopped by the Hyatt about 30 minutes before the bombing but they were booked solid (some tour group had just checked in). I normally stay there as it caters to Westerners. The basement nightclub is well known, as Shahin states, for the place to go for women if you are new to Amman and haven't found the local haunts yet (which exist in ALL countries, Muslim nations included. It just takes some time to develop these ties). There are a couple other well-known western whore haunts but they are under French or German ownership (both vocal opponents against the war) hence not bombed.
Shahin makes many valid and legit points. When I was in Amman ten years ago, there wasn't a single strip club. Within the last two years, they have opened six that I know of. Before the war it was difficult for the un-informed visitor to find a whore. Today it takes fifteen minutes. Plenty of US and UK contractor operations are ran out Amman. Many internats have long-term leases on entire hotel floors where they run their Iraqi operations. You ask any merc which way they would prefer to enter / exit Iraq (you only have TWO choices, Kuwait or Jordan) and they will all agree Jordan. Not only are the Jordanians friendlier to Westerners (even on an individual basis), but Jordan has booze and women right out in the OPEN, something Kuwait doesn't have (even at Western hotels). Some people might not condone this, but after months of war-zone related stress, you just need to let your hair down for a couple days before transiting home or holiday. You need to go wild and get all that pent-up stress and anger out of your system before seeing the people that really care about you, friends and family back home. You don't want or need to take this baggage home with you. Amman provides this outlet (and profits off it quite well).
Food for thought:
- The Hyatt bombing was directed more than people realize (I stopped by the next day to survey the damage). The bomber did not just walk into the lobby and blow himself up. He went directly for the hotel bar (maybe 20 meters aways from the lobby) killing everybody there. I would have been there myself, drunk and dead, had the hotel not been booked solid. Sadly, they also killed the cute hostess who had been seating me for years.
- It doesn't help that the new so-called secular Iraqi government shut down the BIAP liquor store after meeting with Iran two months ago. Before mercs could at least blow off some steam over a few beers with co-workers. Now we are forced to carry an even bigger burden when we visit Amman.
Not that happy about the Amman bombings BUT this mainly has to do with the legit reasons Shahin pointed out. Him and I just sit on different sides the morality coin for these issues. I will be flying back in the next couple weeks, kind of curious if the open hedonism has died down in the aftermath of the bombings. I have my doubts; money is money and whores / drugs / alcohol are all high margin businesses. I know the whorehouses and bars were still going strong a week later. Let's see what a month does.
25 November 2005.
"Jordanian King Abdullah the Second, or rather Queen Elizabeth of Englands Corgi dog, turned Jordan into a brothel for servicing the needs of Crusaders carrying out murder, looting and rape in Iraq. Nobody should be surprised that Crusader inns were targeted."
From: "Party for Islamic Renewal" <lists@tajdeedmail.net>
List-Archive:
<http://217.174.248.39/cgi-bin/mojo/mojo.cgi?f=archive&l=pir>
List-Subscribe:
<http://217.174.248.39/cgi-bin/mojo/mojo.cgi?f=s&l=pir>
List-Unsubscribe:
<http://217.174.248.39/cgi-bin/mojo/mojo.cgi?f=u&l=pir>
Subject: Death in a whorehouse
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 17:40:52 +0000 (GMT)
By: Shahin
UK, 23 November 2005.
"Death in a whorehouse" came to mind after reading Conal Urquharts article in the Guardian about the Amman bombings on 9 November 2005 (below):
Saturday November 12, 2005
The Guardian
The bars (in Amman) are filled with tattooed ex-soldiers, young former officers and eastern European prostitutes. The men talk of the Iraq where they work for private security firms, and the women try to offer them an expensive escape.
War in Iraq has brought an influx of Western visitors and investment to Jordan. Prostitution has become more common... Amman even has a lap-dancing bar... One of the few establishments where eastern European prostitutes could be seen in public was the basement nightclub of the Grand Hyatt hotel.
The Grand Hyatt Hotel was one of the places which were bombed. So, those so-called Muslim hotel patrons who were either blown up or crushed to death in those crusader inns will probably find themselves on the Day of Judgement in the unenviable position of having to explain to the Almighty why they met their end in a crusader whorehouse. Not just any old whorehouse but one owned by Americans, which means funding the crusade.
Conal Urquhart reported earlier in the Guardian (10 November 2005), it (Jordan) has become a service centre for organisations and businesses involved in the occupation (of Iraq). The nightclub of the Grand Hyatt was a popular meeting place for east European prostitutes and foreign workers.
The Mujahideen (Islamic fighters) were not far wrong when an Al-Qaida statement posted on the Internet described the three hotels that were attacked as "filthy entertainment centres for the traitors and apostates of the umma [the Muslim world] and a safe haven for the infidel intelligence services".
Basically, Jordanian King Abdullah the Second, or rather Queen Elizabeth of Englands Corgi dog, turned Jordan into a brothel for servicing the needs of Crusaders carrying out murder, looting and rape in Iraq. Nobody should be surprised that Crusader inns were targeted.
This brings me onto the question of the wedding party caught up in one of the hotel blasts. But first read what the Associated Press reported,
Witnesses at the Grand Hyatt, which is a short distance from the Radisson (the venue of the said wedding reception) in central Amman, said a suicide bomber blew himself up close to the hotel's lobby and bar. An American businessman, who refused to give his name, told the Associated Press news agency: "Several of my friends have died."
Conclusion: These hotels were supplying alcohol without restrictions to Muslims and non-Muslims alike. They are centres for Crusaders to plan and carry out attacks on Iraq as well as venues for promoting prostitution.
Why would any self-respecting Muslim organise a wedding party
at a Crusader whorehouse and drinking den? I doubt if any of the guests who
were resident in Amman did not know what went on in these Kuffar (anti Islam)
hotels. Its like me living in London not being aware of what goes on
at a certain massage parlour in the Kings Cross area.
There are plenty of Muslim-owned halls in Amman, which could have been hired
for holding the wedding reception. But I guess the ones who organised the
wedding party needed a place where the wine could flow freely.
What kind of people would organise a reception at one of those hotels? Answer: Members of the ruling elite. According to Urquhart (Guardian 14 November 2005), (In Jordan) The average wage is £175 a month and most Jordanians would not be able to afford a meal at the Four Seasons or Sheraton hotels.
These hotels were patronised by the ruling elites. It says something about their greed and indifference to the suffering of Iraq. Its the very same ruling elites, which keep Arab apostate rulers on their thrones. Throughout history, no matter how big the tyrant. They always needed the support of the ruling elites to hang onto power. It is not just Abdullah the Second who took the decision to open up Jordan as a transit point/brothel for Crusader forces. The ruling elite, which supports the whole edifice of apostate rule shares the blame. The Crusader dollars which flooded into Jordan as a result of Bushs Crusade against Islam did not filter down to the masses but stayed squarely in the hands of the minority elites as Urquhart confirmed in his report,
the economic benefits (of collaborating with American occupation) have not filtered through to the majority of the population.
Basically the greedy rich who made money from collaborating with the Crusade were the purported Arab "Muslims" who got caught up in the blast as well along with those servicing these whorehouses. To divert attention from their treason against Islam the Jordanian ruling class put about a flurry of lies basically saying that the Mujahideen specifically targeted ordinary Muslims going about their business. In particular the Mujahideen allegedly targeted a wedding reception.
This is contradicted by Urquharts report hardly the work of a fanatical Muslim fundamentalist:
many hotel guests are soldiers, security guards and others who work in Iraq but use Amman as a base.
While most of the victims of Wednesday's suicide bombings were Jordanians, large numbers of Europeans and Americans were close to the explosion at the Grand Hyatt hotel"
In other words Crusaders were the target of the hotel bombings. If, according to the lying Jordanian elites and the Western media, experienced members of the Iraqi Mujahideen had really spent many hours picking targets, allocating scarce resources and spending the lives of Martyrs simply to blow up innocent Muslims then there would be no insurgency in Iraq today because the idiots would have been wiped out by Crusader forces in one week. As if martyrdom operatives and bombs just grow on trees so they can be wasted on civilians! If you believe that then youll believe that Bush is a secret Muslim!
The fact remains that the hotels were targeted for strategic reasons. They were targeted because they were centres of Crusader activity. One of the reasons why the Iraqi insurgents are so successful is because they choose their targets well. If the Mujahideen wanted to blow up innocent Jordanians all they had to do was to leave a car bomb in the middle of Amman. They used martyrs, which shows they needed to get close as possible to actual Crusaders. The smartest of all bombs is the human variety. They achieved that purpose as Urquharts report suggests. The fact that the Crusader media, e.g., the BBC (Blairs Backside Channel) avoided mentioning Western deaths and injuries are proofs of the Mujahideen hitting their target.
Actually, the wedding at the Radisson took place in another floor from the bombing and the guests were killed by falling masonry. Even the Kuffar news pictures show the wedding cake was intact which obviously would not have been the case if the bomber walked into the middle of the reception. I would not be surprised if the organisers of the reception being members of Jordans ruling elite cooperated with the Crusader lie factory!
Would-be wedding planners need not fear the Iraqi Mujahideen. Jordanian party-goers are not important enough for the Mujahideen to waste martyrdom operatives unless crusader inns are chosen as party venues.
Equally ridiculous as the lies alleging the Mujahideen targeted a wedding party were the spontaneous crowds, which appeared within hours of the bombings to denounce the Iraqi Mujahideen. In Jordan, as in every Arab country, you need government permission for any public gathering. Yet these rent-a-crowd demonstrators appeared faster than flies to excrement to pledge their loyalty to Queen Elizabeth of Englands Corgi sitting on the Jordanian throne.
I am not bothered about Jordanian government-sponsored layabouts shouting pointless anti-Mujahideen slogans from the safety of an apostate-run Arab capital. If Abdullah the Seconds maggots were serious about their slogans calling for death to Zarqawi, then all they have to do is get back into the buses the Jordanian government provided to bring them to the demonstrations and just drive across the border into Iraq and find Zarqawi themselves. Im sure Abdullahs Crusader masters would bend over backwards with close air support, artillery, tanks and whatever was needed for these rent-a-heroes to deal out death to the Iraqi insurgents. All it needs is a little bit of a rare commodity lacking in the Arab world called Courage!
Even that well-known mouthpiece of Zionism, The Washington Post, admits that Jordan was an obvious target when you read William M.Arkins report.
Keeping Secrets in Jordan
By William M. Arkin
11/16/05 "Washington Post" -- -- "The United States has had no closer ally than Jordan, and Jordan will find no better friend than the United States at this difficult hour," Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said in a statement issued on Nov. 9. This is not just exaggeration.
Arkin said that when al Qaeda in Iraq says that it undertook its attack because "the tyrant of Jordan has turned [the country] into a back yard for the enemies of Islam, such as the Jews and the Crusaders," their rhetoric should be taken seriously.
King Abdullah II has close military and intelligence ties with America, which increased funding and technical support for the Jordanian regimes security apparatus.
Reliable reports say the Jordanian government has done much dirty work for America, including interrogations and murders. Jordan has been a centre for extraordinary "renditions," or kidnappings, and it has tortured Muslims for America.
Jordan has not only provided "secret" bases for the Crusade, but also was crucial for U.S. operations to occupy Iraq.
Conclusions:
Those so-called Jordanian Muslims who were denouncing the Mujahideen for the benefit of the crusader media had they been genuine Muslims would have actually demonstrated against the Crusade. Even the Western media are now reporting in detail about Americas many war crimes e.g. the latest reports on the use of chemical weapons on 50,000 civilians in Fallujah.
Had these Arab government-backed maggots been sincere Muslims theyd be hiding themselves in shame instead of denouncing the Mujahideen who are sacrificing their wealth, and safety for the sake of Muslims living under Crusader occupation. The prostitutes are just not the Eastern European ones prowling hotels in Arab capitals: Its the Arab elites collaborating with the Crusade and getting fat from the blood of Iraq.
The fact remains the Crusade would never had been possible without the backing of back-stabbing apostate Arabs in Jordan, Oman, Saudi-occupied Arabia, Qatar, Bahrain, Kuwait, and Egypt. Why have the Mujahideen not hit more Arab capitals should be the question?
These "Arab" whores take responsibility for Muslim women and boys being raped in crusader-run jails such as Abu Ghraib, and for the 100,000 plus deaths in Iraq. They share in the crime of the televised murder of Muslims inside mosques and chemical attacks etc.
Far from even whispering any protests these pampered apostates compete with each other so that America can locate their whorehouses in their capitals where crusaders can spend some of the wealth, which they looted from Iraq at the cost of Muslim blood and honour. Today, after the rapes in Abu Ghraib; there is no escaping the fact that Arab honour now lies at the end of an American penis with the so-called Arab street only interested in mouthing off pro-regime slogans for a few measly crumbs thrown at them by their ruling elites.
The Arab Street never stopped the crusade from happening and it wont do anything to help the Mujahideen. Its a fact the overwhelming majority of insurgents in Iraq are Iraqi Muslims (Sunni). Only the Mujahideen have done anything to restore Muslim honour. Quite frankly they should not gives a rats backside for sloganeering apostate Arab regime maggots mouthing off for the benefit of the Crusader media.
And finally: why have more Arab capitals not been hit?
To unsubscribe from: Party for Islamic Renewal, just follow this link:
[ ]
Click this link, or copy and paste the address into your browser.
PIR (The Party
for Islamic Renewal) rejects intellectual terror, supports
the freedom of thought and believes in dialogue based on argument and evidence.
This mailing list strives to educate the general public and inform it about
interesting news, issues worthy of reflection or even points of view worthy
of condemnation and rejection. Therefore the content of the topics published
here should not be regarded as representing PIR's point of view, neither
in full nor in part.