17 October 1999
Source: http://www.usia.gov/cgi-bin/washfile/display.pl?p=/products/washfile/latest&f=99101510.wlt&t=/products/washfile/newsitem.shtml


US Department of State
International Information Programs

Washington File
_________________________________

15 October 1999

State Department Testimony on International Y2K Readiness

 (State Inspector General describes beginning of "Y2K fatigue") (3840)

 A State Department official says that in the United States and
 worldwide, people
 are growing weary of hearing about the Year 2000 computer problem --
 and this international "Y2K fatigue" could lead to complacency about a
 phenomenon that appears less real and less threatening than floods or
 earthquakes.

 In an October 13 statement before the Senate Special Committee on the
 Year 2000 Technology Problem, State Department Inspector General
 Jacquelyn Williams-Bridgers said that much progress has been made and
 "the risk of major Y2K failures appears to diminish every day." But
 she added that much work remains to be done to complete contingency
 plans and to identify high-risk locations worldwide.

 Following is the text of Williams-Bridgers' statement to the
 committee:

 (begin text)

 Senate Special Committee on the Year 2000 Technology Problem

 Testimony of Jacquelyn L. Williams-Bridgers
 Inspector General of the Department of State and
 International Broadcasting
 October 13, 1999

 Mr. Chairman and Members of the Committee: I am pleased to provide a
 statement for the hearing record on the results of our most recent
 analysis of global Year 2000 (Y2K) preparedness and the potential
 impact Y2K failures may have in the international arena. The Y2K
 problem is one of the most challenging project management and systems
 conversion efforts ever faced by the world community. Although no one
 can accurately predict what will happen over the date change, we must
 recognize the potential for disruption both here in the United States
 and abroad.

 SUMMARY

 At a July 1999, hearing before this Committee on global Y2K readiness,
 I provided an overview of international Y2K readiness based on host
 country assessments developed by U.S. embassies and on our own visits
 to 31 sites in 24 countries. My testimony discussed our assessment of
 the relative risk that Y2K might cause failures in key sectors in
 countries around the globe -- and the message was decidedly mixed:

 Approximately half of the 161 countries assessed were reported to be
 at medium or high risk of having Y2K-related failures in their
 telecommunications, energy, and/or transportation sectors;

 Industrialized countries were generally found to be at low risk of
 having Y2K-related infrastructure failures, particularly in the
 finance sector;

 Anywhere from 52 to 68 developing countries (out of 98) were assessed
 as having a medium or high risk of Y2K-related failures in the
 telecommunications, transportation, and/or energy sectors; and

 Finally, and similar to the developing world, key sectors in the Newly
 Independent States and other former Eastern bloc nations, were a
 concern because of the relatively high probability of Y2K-related
 failures.

 We concluded that the global community was likely to experience
 varying degrees of Y2K-related failures in every sector, in every
 region, and at every economic level. In addition, we asserted that the
 risk of disruption would likely extend to the international trade
 arena, where a breakdown in any part of the supply chain would have a
 serious impact on the U.S. and world economies. We recommended, in
 light of the potential disruption that Y2K might cause, that the
 United States take a lead role to encourage and facilitate contingency
 planning by individual countries, regional partners, and international
 organizations such as the United Nations.

 Since that hearing, we have continued collecting Y2K information
 overseas, and have continued our oversight of the Department of
 State's (the Department) Y2K efforts. In this statement I will discuss
 the following:

 The results of recent Office of Inspector General (OIG) visits to four
 key countries to collect Y2K readiness information;

 The need for the Department to continue collecting information from
 its overseas posts concerning host country Y2K readiness, and the
 potential for Y2K-related failures;

 The need for more detailed information on host country Y2K readiness
 to be made available to the public to provide a clearer picture of the
 potential for Y2K-related failures at foreign locations; and

 Finally, the Department's progress in getting its mission critical
 systems Y2K certified.

 At this point, with less than 90 days to go before the Y2K transition,
 the Department needs to guard against complacency. In this country and
 around the globe a phenomenon known as "Y2K Fatigue" is beginning to
 occur in a public grown weary of hearing about this arcane computer
 problem -- one that appears less real and less threatening than floods
 and earthquakes. Still, although much progress has been made and the
 risk of major Y2K failures appears to diminish every day, much work
 remains to be done in contingency planning, and identifying foreign
 locations at high risk. Department of State International Y2K Efforts
 The Department has recognized that the potential for Y2K vulnerability
 is not restricted to its domestic operations and has implemented
 measures to assess the Y2K readiness of all countries where the United
 States has a diplomatic presence. These measures include the
 following:

 In November and December 1998, the Department's embassies and
 consulates used a standard survey to collect information on the
 effectiveness of the host country's Y2K program, vulnerability to
 short-term economic and social turmoil, reliance on technology in key
 infrastructure sectors, and the status of Y2K correctional activities.
 Staff under the direction of the National Intelligence Council
 analyzed the information from this survey, as well as from other
 sources, such as the World Bank, the United States Information Agency,
 and OIG.

 On January 29, 1999, the Department issued a Worldwide Public
 Announcement on the Y2K problem to inform U.S. citizens of the
 potential for problems throughout the world because of the millennium
 "bug." The notice cited specific areas of concern, including
 transportation systems, financial institutions, and medical care, as
 activities that may be disrupted by Y2K-related failures. Further,
 this announcement warned all U.S. citizens planning to be abroad in
 late 1999 or early 2000 to be aware of the potential for problems and
 to stay informed about Y2K preparedness in the location where they
 will be traveling. In addition, the Department established a special
 Y2K website for American citizens traveling or residing abroad with
 links to Y2K websites for foreign governments, international
 organizations, private organizations, and commercial enterprises at
 http://travel.state.gov/y2kca.html.

 In February 1999, the Department provided all of its embassies and
 consulates with a Contingency Planning Toolkit. The posts were
 instructed to use the toolkit to assess the probability that
 Y2K-related failures might occur in key infrastructure sectors,
 including finance, telecommunications, transportation, energy, and
 water/wastewater treatment. Based on this assessment, posts were to
 develop contingency plans and identify the resources (generators,
 radios, etc.) needed to handle Y2K-related emergencies. As of the end
 of June 1999, nearly all of the Department's posts had completed their
 host country infrastructure assessments and developed draft
 contingency plans.

 In June 1999, the Department provided instructions to its embassies
 and consulates on how they should approach host governments concerning
 Y2K issues. Posts were asked to discuss with the host government its
 assessment of Y2K readiness in the country; gain a deeper
 understanding of the local authority's remedial actions and
 contingency plans; and inform the host government that the Department
 has a responsibility to notify American citizens if it is aware of
 credible and specific threats to their safety and security, including
 Y2K problems in critical sectors. The Department hopes that
 approaching all countries now with this information will spur them to
 either correct the problems or develop contingency plans.

 On July 26, 1999, the Department issued a revised Worldwide Public
 Announcement on Y2K highlighting the need for personal preparedness on
 the part of private Americans and noting the inability of embassies
 and consulates to directly provide food, water, and shelter to the
 millions of U.S. citizens abroad. The Public Announcement also
 apprised the public of the measures the Department was taking to keep
 embassies and consulates functioning.

 On September 9, 1999, the Department conducted a worldwide test of its
 host country Y2K reporting system. The Department used this date
 because of the potential that computer systems might fail if they
 interpreted the 9/9/99 date as an error or as the end of a file. The
 test was very successful; as all posts scheduled to report did so.
 Further, approximately 75% of posts reported on this within an hour of
 their assigned reporting time. The Department plans to use this
 reporting system during the critical Year 2000 transition at the end
 of December.

 On September 14, 1999, the Department released updated consular
 information sheets containing Y2K information for 196 countries. These
 sheets provide the Department's official assessment of the potential
 disruption, if any, Y2K might cause.

 OIG Year 2000 Oversight Efforts

 International Y2K Efforts: Host Country Preparedness

 Results of Recent OIG Y2K Visits

 My office has continued its efforts in international Y2K issues by
 engaging host country representatives in discussions and establishing
 venues for information sharing and cooperation. Over the past year, we
 have visited 31 countries, meeting with host country Y2K program
 managers, representatives from key infrastructure sectors, and private
 sector officials to discuss their respective Y2K programs and share
 information. I will summarize below the results of our most recent
 visits to Indonesia, China, Saudi Arabia, and Egypt.

 Indonesia: Indonesia is generally not heavily reliant on computerized
 systems; however, some urban centers are dependent on information
 technology for telecommunications and banking. Overall, the country
 got a late start on Y2K remediation and does not appear to be fully
 prepared to deal with the Y2K problem. Consequently, there is a
 moderate risk of Y2K disruptions across Indonesia, specifically in the
 key sectors of telecommunications and banking and finance.
 Telecommunications appears to be the sector most vulnerable to
 potential Y2K disruptions. Further, the banking sector's heavy
 reliance on telecommunications increases the risk that it may face
 Y2K-related disruptions. The state electrical utility has taken steps
 to effectively address Y2K issues; according to utility officials,
 they have nearly 80 percent excess power generation capacity, thus
 making a power grid failure unlikely. Finally, the government has
 established a separate entity that will provide Y2K
 certification/verification assessments to systems owners.

 China: Major cities in the most developed region of the People's
 Republic of China (essentially a strip running 100 miles or so deep
 along the coast) are moderately reliant on computerized systems.
 Chinese Y2K remediation and contingency planning efforts have focused
 on critical infrastructure systems in these cities, which are
 generally well prepared to deal with the Y2K problem. Ninety percent
 of U.S. citizens in China live in these major cities. Little
 information is available concerning the Y2K readiness of China's
 interior provinces; still, we were told that reliance on computerized
 systems is much lower in these areas, and thus Y2K will likely have a
 low impact. China's power grid passed a Y2K test in early September,
 1999, during which power generating and transmission companies rolled
 through all the Y2K critical dates. Chinese authorities expect that
 any potential disruptions will be concentrated in small- and
 medium-sized enterprises, and that there is a moderate risk of
 disruption in freight-forwarding and distribution networks.

 Saudi Arabia: The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia has implemented a
 comprehensive Y2K effort across all of its ministries. According to
 the July 1999, assessment by the Saudi Arabian Y2K National Committee,
 100 percent of systems in the financial services, clearing/settlement,
 and government sectors were Y2K compliant. Basic utilities were 96
 percent compliant, transportation systems were at 95 percent, and
 telecommunications at 90 percent. The Saudi petroleum sector began its
 Y2K efforts in 1994, and has since completed remediation, testing, and
 certification of its systems, except for a few medical devices used in
 its hospitals. The electric power utility is nearly 100 percent
 compliant, and in any event will have 25 percent excess capacity in
 January 2000 because of lower usage. In the water sector, the Saline
 Water Conversion Corporation has 25 plants at 15 locations around the
 country, producing 700 million gallons of water a day. Most of the
 process control devices used in these plants are analog, some nearly
 30 years old, and which do not have Y2K issues. Saudi Arabia has one
 of the most advanced telecommunications systems in the world, and it
 will be 100 percent compliant by October 31, 1999. Finally, according
 to officials at the National Committee, the health care sector has the
 most significant Y2K-related problems, with the government-run
 hospitals being the furthest behind. They are currently concentrating
 on contingency planning.

 Egypt: The Government of Egypt has implemented a centrally directed,
 well-organized and comprehensive Y2K effort across all civilian
 ministries. The ministries of Interior and Defense have separate
 programs. The Central Bank of Egypt and the country's 54 commercial
 banks have completed their remediation and testing for all critical
 dates, including international clearing. The Egyptian Electric
 Authority states that it has a high level of confidence in its Y2K
 readiness because it has fixed and tested all critical systems and
 embedded devices. Public hospitals, which do not expect to be
 compliant, are implementing a thorough risk management and staff
 training initiative to prepare for contingencies. The
 telecommunications sector is 85 to 90 percent Y2K-ready and is
 pursuing an ongoing Y2K program. Water and sewage treatment appear to
 be mostly manual operations; the embassy in Cairo is continuing to
 assess these and other sectors, such as natural gas and hazardous
 materials. In addition, our embassy in Cairo is strongly supporting
 the Egyptian Government's Y2K program. This effort includes $15.75
 million in U.S. assistance targeting, among others, the power,
 telecommunications, health, water, wastewater, and civil aviation
 sectors. Finally, the Suez Canal Authority states that it will keep
 the Canal clear of ships from around 11:00 p.m. on December 31, 1999,
 through the early morning hours of January 1, 2000. During this
 transition period, canal pilots will inspect shipboard navigation and
 other systems of transiting vessels. The Suez Canal Authority will
 also be checking the status of its own systems.

 Currently, an OIG team is visiting 3 Latin American countries
 --Brazil, Venezuela, and Mexico -- to collect Y2K information and
 develop a final snapshot of Y2K readiness in these key locations.

 Host Country Y2K Information Flow Needs to Continue

 As discussed earlier, the Department's embassies and consulates have
 been reporting on their respective host countries' Y2K readiness since
 late 1998. This information has been used to develop contingency plans
 for post staff, and to inform the public of where Y2K-related failures
 might occur. Further, the Department, including my office, has used
 this information to develop worldwide assessments of the potential
 impact of the Y2K problem on key infrastructure sectors (energy,
 transportation, communications, etc.). At the Committee's July 1999
 hearing on Y2K Readiness and Global Trade, based on embassy
 information and our own visits, we discussed the relative risk that
 Y2K-related failures might occur in key sectors of the world's
 industrial, developing, and eastern bloc countries.

 Because the Y2K global landscape is constantly changing, it is
 essential that the Department continue to collect Y2K readiness
 information from its overseas posts and other sources. Posts are
 continually providing updated country assessments, and these are
 provided to other U.S. government agencies and to the National
 Intelligence Council, which is responsible for maintaining a global
 Y2K database. As we enter the final 90 days of 1999, it is critical
 that the National Intelligence Council keep this information updated
 in order to facilitate decision-making on Y2K issues by U.S.
 government officials both here and abroad, and in order to keep the
 public informed of potential global Y2K problems. More Detailed Y2K
 Readiness Information Needs to be Released As discussed earlier, the
 Department has issued Consular Information Sheets for 196 countries
 describing Y2K readiness and the potential for Y2K-related
 disruptions. This ambitious and noteworthy effort to inform the public
 about potential disruptions abroad has focused public attention on a
 worldwide problem. However, based on a review of 29 information
 sheets, we have concerns about their adequacy. Thirteen of the 29
 contained adequate Y2K information that was correct and specific
 enough to enable someone to make an informed decision about whether to
 travel to those countries. The other 16 Consular Information Sheets
 did not contain adequate assessments because the Y2K information
 provided was too vague. The Department, in its on-going process of
 updating consular Y2K information, is continuously reviewing Y2K
 information for all countries. In particular, the Department is now
 focusing on possible revision of current consular information for some
 countries. Some specific examples of consular information sheets that
 can be improved are as follows:

 Czech Republic: The information sheet on the Czech Republic notes that
 "greater progress in remediation efforts and contingency planning in
 rail service, electricity generation, water supply, and health care
 will help lower the risk of potential disruption." It would be more
 useful if the Department stated whether there was any evidence that
 such progress was being made, and whether it would be made in a timely
 manner. Indonesia: The Department's advisory notes that there is a
 moderate risk of Y2K disruptions across Indonesia, specifically in the
 key sectors of health, telecommunications, and banking and finance.
 However, the sheet goes on to warn, "A long-term disruption of
 electrical power in Jakarta and other major cities is a potentially
 serious Y2K problem." This sentence is inconsistent with information
 collected during our visit with Indonesian power industry officials in
 August 1999, where we were briefed on their extensive efforts to
 remediate Y2K problems in the power sector. Italy: The information
 sheet is largely boilerplate and provides vague information. It should
 be updated to reflect more specifics regarding the current state of
 Y2K remediation and contingency planning to ensure that millions of
 travelers considering a visit to Italy for any of the planned
 millennium celebrations have timely, comprehensive information. Russia
 and Ukraine: The information sheets on these two countries contain
 strong language about the high risk of potential Y2K problems, which
 is generally consistent with the information contained in the embassy
 assessments. However, despite this recognized high risk, the
 Department only provides a vague warning to travelers, suggesting that
 they "take into account fully the information in this document in
 planning their travel and its timing."

 Over the past year the Department's embassies and consulates have
 provided thousands of reports to Washington concerning Y2K efforts in
 their respective host countries. A number of embassies, such as the
 U.S. Embassy in Beijing, China, have made their Y2K reporting
 available to the public through their public web sites. These are
 linked to the Department's Y2K website at
 http://travel.state.gov/y2kca.html. The British Foreign and
 Commonwealth Office's travel website contains detailed,
 sector-specific (energy, water, etc.) Y2K information collected by
 British embassies in dozens of countries. These assessments and other
 analyses by host governments are also available via the Department of
 State's website links. Some of the Department's recently issued
 Consular Information Sheets do not fully capture the scope and content
 of the Y2K information collected by its overseas staff, and may not,
 in all cases, be as useful to the American public as they could be.
 While country-specific Consular Information Sheet Y2K language was
 approved by the respective U.S. embassy, in some cases it reflected
 more recent, updated information than that contained in the post's
 formal assessment reports. In such cases, posts' Y2K country
 assessments should be revised to reflect the changes made during the
 final information sheet drafting process. We recognize that in many
 countries information concerning the level of Y2K readiness is
 sensitive, given the potential impact that Y2K might have on the
 country's economy, its reputation, or even its internal political
 stability. Nonetheless, so Americans can make reasoned, informed
 decisions about where they plan to be on December 31, 1999, we
 recommend that the Department release additional information as it
 becomes available on international Y2K readiness.

 OIG Work within the Department of State

 OIG is also assisting the Department to meet the millennium challenge
 facing its respective information technology infrastructures,
 including computer software, hardware, and embedded devices. The
 Department has recognized that it is vulnerable to the Y2K problem,
 and over the past 2 years has taken steps to remediate its systems and
 infrastructure to prevent disruptions to its critical business
 processes.

 The Department has established a Program Management Office (PMO) that
 is responsible for the overall management of the Department's Y2K
 program. The PMO's responsibilities include tracking and reporting on
 the progress being made by the bureaus in remediating systems,
 providing technical advice and assistance, issuing contingency
 planning guidance, and certifying systems for Y2K compliancy. As of
 May 15, 1999, the Department reported that 100 percent of its
 mission-critical systems had been implemented.

 My office has assisted in establishing a process through which the
 Department can certify the Y2K compliancy of its mission-critical
 systems. The purpose of this process, which we understand is one of
 the most rigorous in the Federal Government, is to provide the
 Department's senior management with assurance that every feasible step
 has been taken to prevent Y2K-related failures on January 1, 2000. We
 assisted in writing detailed guidelines that each bureau must use in
 developing application certification packages for submission to the
 Y2K Project Management Office. In addition, through an agreement with
 the Under Secretary of State for Management, OIG is reviewing the
 adequacy of all certification packages for mission-critical systems
 before they are provided to the Y2K certification panel. Thus far, we
 have evaluated and provided our comments to the Department on 27
 application certification packages, and 14 of those have been
 officially certified. Another nine certification packages are in the
 pipeline, and we expect to review them shortly.

 Finally, in April 1999, the Department initiated planning for
 end-to-end testing of its core business functions. The purpose of
 end-to-end testing is to ensure that the Department can maintain its
 core business functions on and beyond the rollover to the Year 2000.
 The Department's end-to-end test is a test of the critical transaction
 flows through the organization across the major business functions,
 applications, and vendor products that support these transactions.
 State has organized its end-to-end testing around five clusters, each
 of which combines a number of related business functions. For example,
 the Business Management Cluster includes such processes as personnel
 actions, financial management, and logistics. The other four clusters
 are Consular, E-mail, Command and Control Communications, and
 Security. As of September 30, 1999, the Department had completed
 end-to-end testing of four clusters, and plans to complete testing on
 the fifth cluster (Business Management) by October 31, 1999.

 In conclusion, over the next 75 days or so, the Department faces the
 difficult challenge of maintaining the momentum it has developed, and
 keeping the world focused on the Y2K problem. While much progress has
 been made by a large part of the international community to prepare
 for Y2K and to develop contingency plans, much of this effort will be
 for naught if complacency is allowed to take hold. The Department has
 a clear and unequivocal role to play over the next two months, through
 its efforts to continue to fine tune its own contingency plans, to
 collect information on host country Y2K activities, and to assure the
 American public is adequately informed about global Y2K readiness.

 (end text)

 (Distributed by the Office of International Information Programs, U.S.
 Department of State)