12 October 2009
cdc-flu-fuzz7.htm CDC Fuzzes H1N1 Pandemic Reports 7 July 25, 2009
cdc-flu-fuzz6.htm CDC Fuzzes H1N1 Pandemic Reports 6 July 17, 2009
cdc-flu-fuzz5.htm CDC Fuzzes H1N1 Pandemic Reports 5 July 13, 2009
cdc-flu-fuzz4.htm CDC Fuzzes H1N1 Pandemic Reports 4 July 6, 2009
cdc-flu-fuzz3.htm CDC Fuzzes H1N1 Pandemic Reports 3 June 26, 2009
cdc-flu-fuzz2.htm CDC Fuzzes H1N1 Pandemic Reports 2 June 20, 2009
cdc-flu-fuzz.htm CDC Fuzzes H1N1 Pandemic Reports June 18, 2009
Here is yet another article about how the CDC has been lying to the public
in regards to the H1N1 outbreaks.
You may recall that several months ago the CDC was issuing press releases
that the numbers of infected people were stabilizing and decreasing when
in fact the numbers were exploding on a daily basis.
You may also recall that the CDC started to classify the actual numbers when
the outbreak first started, and that the statistics from localized outbreaks
(i.e., Air Force Academy outbreak) were not being reported by the CDC to
the public in an effort to conceal just how bad the situation really
We reached a "Propagation Maturity Stage" with the numbers reported on 7/14/2009,
but at the time the CDC had reported that only 40,716 people were infected,
but now it is coming out that the CDC had confirmed over one million actual
cases at the time, and that it was at this one million mark that they decided
to stop counting.
In short the CDC has been lying about the CDC outbreak and has been lying
all along about the number of infection by almost a 25:1 ratio.
The CDC started a spin control cycle on 5/14/2009, and ran with it for 60
days, and ended it on 7/14/2009.
Doctors visits for flu related symptoms are up over 9 times what they would
normally be at this time of year.
Now that school is back in session the numbers of children and young adults
who are getting sick are exploding, and about 15% of all school and college
students are either sick with this right now, or are getting over being sick
A Congressional Oversight Committee is already investigating the lying that
the CDC was caught engaging in, and why they were recklessly endangering
the public for political gain.
We are going to have a perfect storm once the seasonal flu starts getting
cranked up just after Thanksgiving, and there is both a swine and avian flu
brewing up a mixture of death and sickness.
US, other nations stop counting pandemic flu cases
By Mike Stobbe
The Associated Press
ATLANTA U.S. health officials have lost track of how many illnesses
and deaths have been caused by the first global flu epidemic in 40
And they did it on purpose.
Government doctors stopped counting swine flu cases in July, when they estimated
more than 1 million were infected in this country. The number of deaths has
been sitting at more than 600 since early September. Health officials had
previously counted lab-confirmed cases, though the tally was skewed because
many people who got sick never were tested.
Other nations have stopped relying on lab-confirmed cases, too, and health
officials say the current monitoring system is adequate. But not having specific,
accurate counts of swine flu means the government doesn't have a clear picture
of how hard the infection is hitting some groups of people, said Andrew Pekosz,
a flu expert at Johns Hopkins University.
The novel H1N1 flu seems to be more dangerous for children, young adults,
pregnant women and even the obese, according to studies based on small numbers
of patients. And federal health officials are keeping track of children's
deaths. But exactly how much more at risk kids and other groups are is hard
to gauge if the overall numbers are fuzzy.
"This wasn't as critical early on, when case numbers were low," said Pekosz.
But now, it's hard to say exactly how swine flu's dangers vary from group
to group, he said.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is relying on a patchwork
system of gathering death and hospitalization numbers. Some states are reporting
lab-confirmed cases. Others report illnesses that could be the new swine
flu, seasonal flu or some other respiratory disease.
Some say that's a more sensible approach than only counting lab-confirmed
cases. Many people who got sick never get tested, so the tally of swine flu
cases was off almost from the very beginning, they say.
"It was a vast underestimate," said Dr. Zack Moore, a respiratory disease
expert for the North Carolina Department of Health and Human
What's more, as the initial panic of the new virus ebbed, fewer people were
fully tested, so the results weren't as accurate or comprehensive. "The kinds
of numbers you were getting later in the summer were different from the numbers
early on," said Dr. Daniel Jernigan, deputy director of the CDC's influenza
That's why the CDC shifted to counting the new flu like it counts seasonal
flu cases, agency officials said. "We're concerned folks are focused on the
numbers and missing that influenza is monitored by looking at trends," Jernigan
It's likely that millions of Americans have been sickened by swine flu by
now, CDC officials say. New York City alone estimates it had roughly 1 million
cases since swine flu first hit last spring.
While everyone would like an exact measure of how every disease is affecting
society, that simply doesn't exist. "We don't even have a good measure of
how many heart attacks there are every day," which would seem like a relatively
easy thing to track, noted Marc Lipsitch, a Harvard University professor
More comprehensive tracking is not possible with current resources and medical
record-keeping, some public health advocates say.
"The fact that it is a challenge to come up with these data proves that we
have underdeveloped surveillance systems in this country," said Jeff Levi,
executive director of Trust for America's Health, a Washington-based public
health research organization.
Most disease investigation and case-counting is done by state and local health
departments. But quality varies state to state, and in many places it may
be getting worse: State budget shortfalls and other problems led to the
elimination of 7,000 health department jobs last year and 8,000 more jobs
in the first six months of this year.
"You take for granted this work goes on. But it is difficult to take for
granted any longer, with these cuts going on," said Robert Pestronk, executive
director of the National Association of County and City Health
However, Pestronk and others think the government's current system of flu
tracking is adequate and getting better.
The CDC has nine ways of monitoring influenza. Some focus on people who die
from flu-like illness -- one tracking deaths of children, another counting
pneumonia and flu deaths of all ages in 122 cities.
Other systems gather flu-testing information from labs across the country.
And some rely on reports of flu-like illness from hospital emergency departments
and from estimates from state and territorial health officials.
Those systems combine to give a good general picture of whether more or fewer
people are going to the doctor with flu, and how often lab samples are showing
swine flu as compared to other respiratory bugs, health officials
There are problems that make even that data incomplete or inaccurate. Rapid
flu tests -- which are used in counting hospitalizations -- are often wrong
when they indicate a patient doesn't have swine flu, CDC studies have shown.
In some cases, flu or swine flu was only confirmed at autopsy. But most deaths
are not autopsied.
These problems are not unique to the United States. The World Health Organization
also stopped counting cases in July, after deciding that tracking individual
swine flu cases was too overwhelming for countries where the virus was spreading
widely. The WHO has continued to update swine flu reports, but with the
disclaimer that since countries are no longer required to test and report
cases, WHO's numbers underestimate.
Britain also releases weekly swine flu updates, but the numbers are estimates
based on how many people go to their doctors with flu-like illness, as well
as calls logged to the national flu service.
Despite resource limitations and data imperfections, experts say the U.S.
system is good enough to alert the experts when major changes occur in the
"There will always be an error factor, misdiagnosis, misclassifications,"
said Pestronk, formerly the head of a county health department in Michigan.
"We'll never be at 100 percent of people getting tested. The question is
what's good enough for purposes of planning and acting on the burden of disease."
Phone: (978) 546-3803
Fax: (978) 546-9467
127 Eastern Avenue
No enterprise is more likely to succeed than one concealed from the
enemy until it is ripe for execution. - Machiavelli, The Prince, 1521