28 June 2012
Ecuador Has Two Forms of Political Asylum
http://www.elcomercio.com/politica/Regimen-interpretacionesopuestas-asilo-politico_0_726527614.html
[Google translation.]
El Comercio (Quito)
The scheme has conflicting interpretations of political asylum
Thursday 28/06/2012
Rafael Correa's government has different ways of interpreting the figure
of the asylum. It is based on who requests it. The first is a critical, when
an Ecuadorian citizen seeking asylum in a third country, feeling persecuted
politically for his regime. Since last February, six people have applied
for such protection, considering that his integrity was at risk against the
Correa administration.
The journalist Emilio Palacio and Carlos Perez, director of The Universe,
were the first to call for such protection to United States and Panama. They
did it on the grounds that Correa lobbied on trial for insulting them, where
they received an adverse ruling. By then, the various government spokesmen
chose to dismiss both applications. The processing of the Palace is branded
as "ridiculous", while in the case of Perez said that there was no need to
issue a pass so he could go from the Embassy of Panama to the airport.
"Government action was shameful and blatant disregard of the conditions of
asylum." That is the criterion of Joffre Campaign, solicitor of The Universe,
who notes that in this chapter, the Executive showed "contempt" for the
institution of asylum policy.
A similar stance taken by the Government in May. This month, four suppliers
of the contracts between the state and firms linked to Fabricio Correa asked
for political asylum in Britain, Costa Rica, Chile and Panama. On that occasion,
the government not only dismissed the suppliers, but the Foreign Office displayed
a diplomatic offensive to block their applications. From the office of Foreign
Minister Ricardo Patiño contact was made with the various foreign
ministries of the countries involved. In these dialogues the Ecuadorian diplomacy
explained that suppliers were tried by a criminal offense. The government
accuses them of lying, because in its report noted that Correa allegedly
did know of his brother's contracts with the state.
"At that time the Government did not think our human rights, as it says in
the case of Julian Assange". With those words, the seer Paul Chambers questioned
the opposite view that the President has asked for asylum against the Director
of Wikileaks, a refugee from the previous week at the Embassy in London.
In fact, in the case of Assange, the Government has evidenced its second
way to interpret the institution of asylum.
In this regard, the President said he will discuss in detail the grounds
on which requested protection Assange Ecuador. In addition, he anticipated
that the decision whether to grant asylum to journalist who has four demands
for sexual offenses in Sweden, is a sovereign decision of Ecuador.
Luis Saavedra, director of the Regional Foundation of Human Rights Advisory,
explains that political asylum is a right that people have, to be persecuted
in their countries. And while indicating that it is normal that governments
seek to stop asylum claims, objected that Ecuador use a tone "angry" and
"arrogant" to do when he is accused of persecution, as in the case of suppliers.
From the diplomatic notes that it is wrong that the government has different
interpretations of political asylum, depending on who you ask.
Ambassador Luis Narvaez stresses that since the state must have a course
of action be in line with "the legal and human depth of the topic" in any
situation.
|