5 October 2013
NSA Tor Media Reports Stink, Disinformative
Related NSA and GCHQ Tor and related documents:
2013-1365.htm NSA EgotisticalGiraffe Differs in Guardian-WaPo October 5, 2013
2013-1364.htm NSA Informed on Tor by Roger Dingledine October 5, 2013
2013-1363.htm Packet Staining October 5, 2013
2013-1359.htm NSA Link Removed by Guardian October 5, 2013
2013-1357.pdf NSA IAT Tor via/Guardian October 4, 2013 (2.7MB)
2013-1356.pdf NSA Tor Stinks via/Guardian October 4, 2013 (4.2MB)
2013-1355.pdf NSA Egotisticalgiraffe Tor Attack via/Guardian October 4, 2013 (3.2MB)
2013-1354.pdf NSA Report on Tor via/WaPo October 4, 2013
2013-1353.pdf GCHQ on MULLENIZE Tor Staining via/WaPo October 4, 2013
2013-1350.htm Questioning Snowden Truth October 3, 2013
2013-1348.pdf Glenn Greenwald and Janine Gibson Reddit Q&A October 3, 2013
2013-1347.htm The Guardian by the New Yorker October 3, 2013
And:
NSA tracks Google ads to find Tor users:
http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-57606178-83/nsa-tracks-google-ads-to-find-tor-users/
Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2013 00:17:11 -0700
From: Andy Isaacson <adi[at]hexapodia.org>
To: liberationtech <liberationtech[at]mailman.stanford.edu>
Subject: Re: [liberationtech] 49 Page NSA analysis of Tor
Cc: cypherpunks[at]cpunks.org
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 02:05:23PM -0700, d.nix wrote:
> Just published by Bart Gellman (Thanks Bart!):
>
http://apps.washingtonpost.com/g/page/world/nsa-research-report-on-the-tor-encryption-program/501/
[The NSA report:
http://cryptome.org/2013/10/nsa-tor.pdf]
This is the output of a student Summer Program project, as advertised here:
http://www.nsa.gov/careers/opportunities_4_u/students/undergraduate/msep.shtml
Cryptanalysis and Exploitation Services Summer Program
(CES SP)
(formerly MSEP)
The Cryptanalysis and Exploitation Services Summer Program
(CES SP)
is open to undergraduate students majoring in mathematics,
computer
science, or a major with a strong background in math and
computer
science.
Here's one interesting story about a summer program invitation:
http://mathbabe.org/2012/08/25/nsa-mathematicians/
The 2006 CES SP Tor paper is pretty superficial; they make several claims
that don't bear up under the slightest analysis ("we might be able to MITM
a Tor node because the certificates are self-signed") and don't seem to have
developed any significant analysis or attacks on the
system.
This document doesn't give much insight into capabilities the IC has developed
against Tor. It's apparently quite common to run multiple research
teams (either known or unknown to each other) against a single target, and
a few summer students with a dozen lab machines is a pretty small
investment. I'd expect there are other programs with more sophisticated
attacks, especially now 7 years later.
In fact the most enlightening fact about this paper might be that the NSA
thought Tor was worth attacking *at all* in 2006.
I wonder if tor.eff.org has any referer logs from 2006 showing inbound traffic
from http://wiki.gchq/ or
similar.
-andy
|