23 April 1997
Thanks to Greg Broiles
IR | UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE | The Under Secretary for Export Administration [Stamp] | Washington. D.C. 20230 RECEIVED | 17 JAN 2 PM 1997 | DEC 24 1996 FT T1176 The Honorable Newt Gingrich Speaker of the House of Representatives Washington, D.C. 20515 Dear Mr. Speaker: I hereby notify Congress that the Department of Commerce is imposing U.S. foreign policy export controls on commercial encryption items, including products with key recovery features. I am taking this action, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, in the belief that these controls are necessary to further significantly the foreign policy of the United States. Pursuant to Section 6 of the Export Administration Act of 1979, as amended (the Act), the Commerce Department must submit a report to Congress when it imposes, expands or extends export controls. The Department of Commerce is acting under the authority conferred by Executive Order No. 12924 of August 19, 1994 (extended by notices of August 15, 1995 and August 14, 1996), whereby the President, by reason of the lapse of Act, invoked his authority, including that under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, to continue the system of export controls that were in effect, to the extent permitted by law. Under a policy of conforming actions under the Executive Order to those under the Act, insofar as appropriate, the Department is following the provisions of Section 6 of the Act in taking this action. On November 15, 1996, the President issued a Memorandum and Executive Order 13026 (November 15, 1996, 61 FR 58767) concerning the transfer to the Commerce Control List of all encryption items controlled on the U.S. Munitions List, except those specifically designed, developed, configured, adapted, or modified for military applications. The Memorandum also sets forth certain additional provisions with respect to controls on such encryption items to be imposed by the Department of Commerce. The Executive Order also provides for appropriate controls on the export and. foreign dissemination of encryption items controlled on the U.S. Munitions List that are placed on the Commerce Control List. The Secretaries of Commerce and State as directed by the President have proceeded to implement the transfer of commercial encryption items, including products with key recovery technologies, from the U.S. Munitions List to the Commerce Control List. Consistent with the provisions of Section 6 of the Act, the Secretary of Commerce is imposing foreign policy export controls on these products to supplement the national security controls to be applied to these items. These controls are imposed to ensure that encryption products are not exported to destinations or end-uses of concern. [1]
The purpose of the control is to protect U.S. national security and foreign policy interests. The United States is maintaining such controls because of potential military and terrorist applications for the products in a manner contrary to U.S security or foreign policy interests. Moreover, such products, when used by international criminal organizations, can threaten the safety of U.S. citizens here and abroad, as well as the safety of the citizens of other countries. The United States will require an export license for all destinations, except Canada, for exports and reexports of certain encryption items, including products containing key recovery features. The United States will review license applications for the above items, on a case-by-case basis, to determine whether the export or reexport is consistent with U.S. national security and foreign policy. These controls are part of the Administration initiative to facilitate a worldwide key management infrastructure with the use of key recovery and key escrow encryption items to promote electronic commerce and secure communications while protecting national security and public safety. To provide for a transition period for the development of this key management infrastructure, this rule permits the export and reexport of 56-bit key length DES or equivalent strength encryption items under the authority of a License Exception, if an exporter makes satisfactory commitments to build or market recoverable encryption items and to help build the supporting international infrastructure. This policy will apply to hardware and software. Pursuant to authority delegated by the Secretary of Commerce, I am now imposing foreign policy export controls on commercial encryption items, including products with key recovery features. In addition, as required by section 6 of the Act, I determine that foreign policy controls for replacement parts and for parts in goods subject to control should remain in effect. The attached report describes the imposition of controls, including the potential economic impact on U.S. industry and the prospects for enforcement of the controls. This action is taken in consultation with the Secretary of State. We have consulted with the appropriate Congressional Committees and have provided them copies of the report. The Department of Commerce will publish regulations implementing this action in the Federal Register. Sincerely, [Signature] William A. Reinsch Enclosure [2]
REPORT TO THE CONGRESS IMPOSITION OF FOREIGN POLICY EXPORT CONTROLS on COMMERCIAL ENCRYPTION ITEMS, INCLUDING PRODUCTS WITH KEY RECOVERY FEATURES I. INTRODUCTION This report notifies the Congress of the imposition of foreign policy export controls as provided in Section 6 of the Export Administration Act of 1979, as amended (the Act). Pursuant to the provisions of Section 6 of the Act, whenever the U.S. Government imposes, expands or extends export controls, the Commerce Department must submit a report to Congress. In light of the expiration of the Act, the President, invoking his authority, including that under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, issued Executive Order 12924 of August 19 1994, and continued, to the extent permitted by law, the system of export controls in effect under the Act. Under a policy of conforming actions under Executive Order 12924 to those under the Act insofar as appropriate, the Commerce Department is following the provisions of Section 6 of the Act in taking this action. The Secretaries of Commerce and State as directed by the President, have proceeded to implement the transfer of commercial encryption items, including products with key recovery features, from the U.S. Munitions List (USML) to the Commerce Control List (CCL). The Secretary of Commerce is imposing foreign policy controls on these products to supplement the national security controls to be applied to these items. A. Export Control Program Description In accordance with the delegated authority granted in Section 6 of the Act, the Secretary of Commerce is imposing foreign policy export controls on commercial encryption items, including encryption products with key recovery features. These controls are imposed to ensure that exports of these items do not adversely affect important U.S. interests. On November 15, 1996, the President issued a Memorandum and Executive Order 13026 (15 November 1996, 61 FR 58767) concerning the transfer to the Commerce Control List of all encryption items controlled on the U.S. Munitions List, except those specifically designed, developed, configured, adapted, or modified for military applications. The Memorandum also sets forth certain additional provisions with respect to controls on such encryption items to be imposed by the Department of Commerce. The Executive Order also provides for appropriate controls on the export and foreign dissemination of encryption items controlled on the U S. Munitions List that are placed on the Commerce Control List. [1]
Non-recoverable encryption items up to 56-bit key length DES or equivalent strength will be permitted for export and reexport after a one-time review, if an exporter makes satisfactory commitments to develop, produce, and/or market products that support recoverable encryption items and to support an international key management infrastructure. This policy will apply to hardware and software. The relaxation of export and reexport controls on non-recoverable encryption items up to 56-bit key length DES or equivalent strength will last until December 31, 1998. The temporary relaxation of controls is one part of a broader encryption policy initiative designed to promote electronic information security and public safety. The interim rule that will be issued by the Bureau of Export Administration amends the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) by imposing national security and foreign policy controls on certain encryption items. These items do not include those that are specifically designed, developed, configured, adapted or modified for military applications (including command, control and intelligence applications). Such items remain on the U.S. Munitions List, and continue to be controlled by the Department of State, Office of Defense Trade Controls. The controls imposed by the rule apply to encryption software, transferred from the U.S. Munitions List to the Commerce Control List pursuant to, the President's Memorandum of November 15, 1996 (61 FR 58767). The interim rule also amends the Export Administration Regulations to require a license for exports and reexports to all destinations, except Canada, of certain controlled encryption items. The interim rule implements the President's directive to the Secretary of Commerce to take actions to control the export of assistance to foreign persons in the same manner and to the same extent as the export of such assistance is controlled under the Arms Export Control Act. The rule involves no new curtailment of exports, because the transfer or removal of items from the United States Munitions List to the CCL maintains a continuity of controls. Therefore, the provisions of the Export Administration Act regarding the impact of new controls do not apply, and contract sanctity also does not apply to this imposition of controls. B. Licensing Requirements and Policy 1. In general, the United States will require a validated license for all destinations, except Canada, for exports and reexports of commercial encryption items. However, certain exceptions to the licensing requirements may apply. 2
2. Export license applications for commercial encryption items will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis, to determine whether the export or reexport is consistent with U.S. national security and foreign policy interests. 3. Exporters of non-recoverable 56-bit DES or equivalent encryption products will be required to make commitments develop and market products that support key escrow or recovery. The Administration believes that the worldwide use of recoverable encryption products will promote electronic commerce and the security of communications, while protecting national security and public safety. II. PURPOSE OF CONTROLS AND REQUIRED DETERMINATIONS A. The Purpose of the Control The purpose of the control is to protect U.S. national security and foreign policy interests, including the safety of U.S. citizens. Encryption can be used to conceal other foreign communications that have foreign policy and national security significance for the United States. For example, encryption can be used to conceal communications of terrorists, drug smugglers or others intent on taking hostile action against U.S. facilities, personnel, or security interests. In issuing the November 15 Memorandum the President stated: Encryption products, when used outside the United States, can jeopardize our foreign policy and national security interests. Moreover, such products, when used by international criminal organizations, can threaten the safety of U.S. citizens here and abroad, as well as the safety of the citizens of other countries. The exportation of encryption products must be controlled to further U.S. foreign policy objectives, and promote our national security, including the protection of the safety of U.S. citizens abroad. This initiative will make it easier for Americans to use strong encryption items to protect their privacy, intellectual property and other valuable information. It will support the growth electronic commerce, increase the security of the global information infrastructure, and sustain the economic competitiveness of U.S. encryption product manufacturers during the transition to a key management infrastructure. To ensure that a U.S. key management infrastructure is one that our major trading partners can accept, the United States is working bilaterally with countries that are already developing encryption products and encryption technology policy, and with the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, to create an international framework to promote the use of 3
encryption through key management. A global voluntary key management infrastructure provides the best means of using strong encryption in a way that balances U.S. national security, foreign policy, and law enforcement interests with the need for strong encryption in international commerce. The controls demonstrate a leadership role of the United States in developing a global key management infrastructure. B. Determinations of the Secretary of Commerce Regarding the Criteria Set Forth in Section 6(b) of the Act: 1. Probability of Achieving the Intended Foreign Policy Purpose The Secretary of Commerce has determined that the control is likely to achieve the intended purpose of denying the export of commercial encryption items, including products with key recovery features, if its export would be contrary to U.S. national or foreign policy interests. 2. Compatibility with Foreign Policy Objectives. Th Secretary has also determined that the controls are compatible with the foreign policy objectives of the United States. The control is consistent with U.S. foreign policy goals to promote peace and stability and to prevent U.S. exports that might contribute to destabilizing military capabilities and assisting international terrorist or criminal activities against the United States. The controls will also contribute to public safety by promoting the protection of U.S. citizens overseas. 3. Reaction of Other Countries. The Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of State, has determined that the reaction of other countries to this control is not likely to render the control ineffective in achieving its intended foreign policy purpose or to be counterproductive to U.S. foreign policy interests. Other allied countries recognize the need to control exports of encryption products for national security and law enforcement reasons. These countries also recognize the desirability of restricting goods that could compromise shared security and foreign policy interests. 4. Economic Impact on U.S. Industry. The Secretary has determined that the transfer of commercial encryption items, including products with key recovery features, from the USML to the CCL will benefit industry positively and make U.S. manufacturers more competitive in the world market. Removal of these products from the USML may actually improve their marketability to foreign, civil end-users who prefer not to trade in items classified as a munition by the United States Government. Moreover, since recoverable encryption products pose fewer security and law enforcement risks, their export will be 4
treated more liberally than exports of encryption products with no recovery features. This will allow U.S. manufacturers and exporters to capture a larger share of the growing world demand for recoverable encryption. 5. Enforcement of Control. The Secretary has determined that the United States has the ability to enforce these controls effectively. The Department expects to meet the enforcement challenges of this control. Some encryption software will be included in mass market software sold to retail customers, many of whom may be unfamiliar with export controls. It may be stored on media which are small and easily concealed and it may be transmitted electronically. The media containing encryption items that are eligible exports under a license exception may be identical in appearance to media containing encryption items that require a license for export. All of these features increase the difficulty of enforcing the control. Nevertheless, a number of factors are expected to offset these difficulties. A number of manufacturers and exporters are aware of the license requirements because they have been dealing with State Department license requirements for the same items. Through outreach efforts the Commerce Department will attempt to increase the awareness of these controls by potential exporters. Enforcing these controls is a priority for the Commerce Department. The agency intends to train, in 1997, its enforcement personnel in these controls and in investigative techniques for detecting and preventing violations. Finally, since these items are also under multilateral control, we can expect cooperation from foreign enforcement agencies in preventing violations and punishing violators. C. Consultation with Industry. The U.S. Government consulted with various elements within industry on the proposed change in controls and on the desirability of development of recoverable encryption products for both Government and industry use. In preparation for the USML rationalization exercise, the State Department also published a number of Federal Register notices dealing with the and other changes to the USML. Industry comments overwhelmingly favored inclusion of commercial encryption items, including products with key recovery features, on the CCL versus the USML. D. Consultation with Other Countries. The United States has taken the lead in international efforts to control sensitive items, urging other supplier nations to adopt and apply export controls comparable to those of the United States. The major industrial partners of the United States maintain export controls on encryption products. Pursuant to 5
agreement to establish a new regime for the control of conventional arms and sensitive dual-use technologies, the 33 participants in the Wassenaar Arrangement have agreed to control these items on a global basis and to coordinate export policies for such items. The President has also named a Special Envoy to explain U.S. cryptography policy to key allies. In addition, the United States and other members of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development are discussing international cryptography policy guidelines to include the use of encryption products with key recovery features. E. Alternative Means Alternatives to export controls at this time would not be the most effective means of achieving the intended national security and foreign policy objectives. The United States has undertaken a wide range of diplomatic means, both bilateral and multilateral, to encourage the proper restrictions over these items. However, these efforts can only supplement, not replace the effectiveness of actual export controls. F. Foreign Availability. The Department of Commerce and the National Security Agency (NSA) prepared a joint study of the international market for computer software with encryption. The study found that the U.S. software industry still dominates world markets for encryption. In those markets not offering strong encryption locally, U.S. software encryption remains the dominant choice. However, the existence of foreign products with labels indicating DES (Data Encryption Standard) or other strong algorithms, even if they are less secure than claimed, can nonetheless have a negative effect on U.S competitiveness. The study also notes that the existence of strong U.S. export controls on encryption may have discouraged U.S. software producers from enhancing the security features of general purpose software products to meet the anticipated growth in demand by foreign markets. The study found that all countries that are major producers cf commercial encryption products control exports of these products to some extent. A few countries control imports and domestic of encryption, as well. In regard to foreign availability as it relates to encryption items transferred from the USML to the CCL, the President's Executive Order of November 15, 1996 stated the following: I have determined that the export of encryption products [transferred to the Commerce Control List] could harm national security and foreign policy interests even where comparable products are or appear to be available from 6
sources outside the United States, and that facts and questions concerning the foreign availability of such encryption products cannot be made subject to public disclosure or judicial review without revealing or implicating classified information that could harm United States national security and foreign policy interests. Accordingly, sections 4(c) and 6(h)(2)-(4) of the Export Administration Act of 1979, 50 U.S.C. App. 2403(c) and 2405(h)(2)-(4), as amended and as continued in effect by Executive Order 12924 of August 19, 1994, and by notices August 15, 1995, and August 14, 1996, all other analogous provisions of the EAA relating to foreign availability, the regulations in the EAR relating to such EAA provisions shall not be applicable with respect to export controls on such encryption products. Notwithstanding this, the Secretary of Commerce may, in his discretion, consider the foreign availability of comparable encryption products in determining whether to issue a license in a particular case or to remove controls on particular products, but is not required to issue licenses in particular cases or to remove controls on particular products based on such consideration. U.S. Department of Commerce Bureau of Export Administration December 1996 7
[Congressional Record: January 20, 1997 (House)] [Page H160-H168] From the Congressional Record Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov] [DOCID:cr20ja97-18] 105th CONGRESS 1st SESSION HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES EXECUTIVE COMMUNICATIONS, ETC. ***** Under clause 2 of Rule XXIV, executive communications were taken from the Speaker's table as follows: COMMUNICATION 1020 from the Department of Commerce, Under Secretary for Export Administration transmitting the Department's report entitled "Imposition of Foreign Policy Export Controls on Commercial Encryption Items, Including Products with Key Recovery Features", pursuant to Section 6 of the Export Administration Act of 1979, as amended. Referred to the Committee on International Relations. January 20, 1997.